A Question, A Theory and an Old School Fuck You
Now, I should probaby clarify that last bit a little better and say that this is not an old school fuck you from me. Its an old school fuck you from white america, that long established old boy network created by and propogated for the seat of power to be firmly and permanently filled with old, fat white men.
Which should be fine with me, I'm a young, mostly thin white man. All I have to do to succeed is get old. I'm pretty sure I can handle that.
But I don't want to go that route if I can help it, I mean, if I hit 50 and my only option is to invoke fat older white guy status then I may just have to, you know, to keep the lobster and filet mignon on the table.
Anyway, this wasn't supposed to be about any of that.

I was thinking last night, about the supposed sexual peaks experienced by men and by women. Specifically, the ages at which those theoretical peaks are achieved. The first caveat is that they are mere means, averages, for the species which indicates that some of us will peak earlier and others later. Regardless, the argument should continue to stand.

The deal is that men reach their sexual peak at or around the age of 18, that is, at 18 a man's body is pumping at full speed, full volume and hopped up on testosterone and a whole raft (thanks Layne) of other internally produced narcotics. Which is all well and good though I'm coming up on double 18 years old now. Balling was easy at 18, easy but simple. Now its a whole new and whole way more fun ballgame.

Anyway, men at 18 but women supposedly peak at 35. That is the assumed correct number, right? Set me straight if I'm wrong. Not that sub 35 year old women can have orgasms, by any means. But that, at 35 a woman's body is most fully charged for sexual stimulation, give or take a few years.

However, a glance at the historical record and current correlary evidence of modern day apes, we're not intended to live much past 40. And that was old way back when there was no government, there were virtually no cities and we weren't all that far removed from the animals we banded together to protect against. So why would the bar for women be set so much higher and closer to death, indicating that a sizable number of our female ancestors died before reaching a sexual crescendo. Where's the evolutionary reasoning behind that? Why reward only a few women with maximum sexual potential?

And then I remember that we're dealing with old, fat white men. And I remember that, in the transformation from young, fit white man to old, fat white man, there's a bitterness component that rationalizes all activities to further one's own numerical worth in a ham fisted attempt to appear to be a better person. An entitlement bitteration if you will.

Why would they, these bitter old bags of wind (literally, farting buggers), want to make women believe that they hit their sexual peak at 35ish? I can think of some far fetched theories but truly, maybe its because they are inherently battling women as well as everyone else, remember that it is an old BOY network. Part of its charter is the exclusion of non boys and non whites, basically. In fact, add in accumulate more wealth than we'll ever need and it IS their charter.

Funny, I remember telling Heather's little brother to remember that, Its always boys against girls until you find the right one.

Anyway, maybe they did it out of a sense of pure spite. Belief often has a large hand in dictating reality and believing one's peak is years off could go a long way to dampening the true peak in one's 20's or teens. Who knows? Who cares?

Sex is fun, go have some. Copulate, fornicate, bump uglies, shine her shoes (old, old inside joke), get dirty with, hump or otherwise have some fun pleasing and being pleased.